Reconsider Migrant Program

Follow us on LinkedIn, Instagram, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter

Listen On Goodpods

Sydney, March 16: Sapien Ventures, a pan Asia Pacific, technology venture capital firm, is calling on the Federal Government to urgently reconsider plans to alter Australia’s Significant Investor Visa (SIV) program. 
The Albanese Government has signalled intentions to review the program, with the Home Affairs Minister Clare O’Neal saying it “isn’t adding value to the country.”
“Nothing could be further from the truth,” Sapien Ventures founder and Managing Director, Victor Jiang said.
“It is the view of investors, founders, entrepreneurs and the broader tech community that this view is missing some fundamental facts and strategic vision for the Australian economy.”
The SIV program, first introduced in 2012, allows skilled migrants to have their visa applications fast-tracked if they invest $5 million in Australia.
Data from the Department of Home Affairs reveals the SIV program has been successful in bringing in nearly 3000 approved investor migrants and approximately A$15 billion in foreign direct inbound capital since its inception more than a decade ago. 
According to a study by Credit Suisse Australia, the average SIV investor contributes an additional A$5 in flow-on GDP activities in Australia for every dollar of SIV capital invested.
This could equate to approximately A$75 billion of further indirect GDP contributions to Australia or A$90 billion in total GDP contributions in just over 10 years.
More importantly, the SIV Program has had a mandatory minimum allocation of 10 per cent of SIV capital to eligible Australian VC/PE funds since July 2015, with that threshold increased to 20 per cent since July 2021.
These funds must also deploy 80 per cent or more of the said capital into Australian-domiciled innovation companies which must satisfy two out of three tests on Australian-based assets, staff and revenue.
According to Sapien’s modelling based on a wide range of industry data, some A$800 million is estimated to have been channeled into the Australian innovation economy via SIV-compliant VC and PE funds, by this June.
According to Jiang, without that A$800 million in funding, many more Australian innovation entrepreneurs will have had to leave Australia to source the capital internationally, causing further brain-drains and reducing Australia’s global competitiveness.
“When a company is venture-funded, its first mission is usually to create local jobs by hiring staff, and the successful ones go on to create further value via ongoing company profits, tax revenue, R&D expenditure and export sales,”Jiang said.
“Certain technology platform companies can create a network-effect of further GDP activities. 
For example Sapien portfolio company Airtasker (first invested in 2016) went on to create 2.4 million ad-hoc jobs for hundreds of thousands of Australians; whilst another portfolio company Global Study Partners (first invested in 2017) went on to help recruit over 10,000 international students a year into Australia, thereby contributing to AU$300-400 million in direct tuition revenue for hundreds of Australian universities and colleges and over AU$1 billion in indirect GDP value annually, through lifestyle expenditure by these students. All of these portfolio companies received SIV VC/PE funding”, said Mr Jiang.
Sapien also believes that more can be done to increase venture capital funding to retain local talent and further attract international talents toward Australian shores.
For example, the mandatory SIV VC/PE allocation of minimum 20 per cent can be increased to 50 per cent over time, and publicly announced as such. This would help to retain Australian innovation talent and reduce the need for promising startups to seek funding overseas.
dditionally, Sapien Ventures also suggests that the SIV VC/PE component should no longer be eligible for tax-free incentives on investment profits. Instead, the government should modify the SIV regulations to allow investment profits to be CGT-taxable.
This is unlikely to deter SIV applications but could generate an incremental tax revenue of $100 million for every A$400 million in VC/PE investment profits.
“As a nation, it’s important we retain our brilliant minds. Right now, we’re losing them to other countries. In venture-capital-dollars-per-capita terms, Australia currently ranks 15th globally at US$145 per capita, according to a widely-cited Crunchbase News Report from 02-Nov-2021.
Singapore, in contrast, with a population barely larger than Sydney’s, ranks first in the world with US$1398 per capita.
Singapore also has two times more VC funding in absolute terms (at US$8.25b) compared to Australia’s US$3.76b.”
“The SIV program has been an important buffer in bridging the gap in venture capital funding in Australia. However, more needs to be done to retain our innovative and entrepreneurial talent domestically,” Jiang said.
“If the SIV program was not available, we would argue that many companies that now support and empower entire sectors of the economy would not have made the impacts that they have made.
“That’s a loss of job creation, GDP activity, tax revenue, export sales, global competitiveness of Australian industries, as well as the livelihoods of many segments of society who can ill afford to do without the services or offerings of these systemically important companies.” 
“We urge the Australian government to take action to protect and enhance the SIV program so that Australia can one day reach the levels of innovation funding and global competitiveness like Israel or Singapore,” Jiang said.

Additional recommendations by Sapien Ventures:

  • That the government awards a “fast-tracking or prioritisation of applications” to SIV investors that are willing to invest more than the minimum allocation to VC/PE (such as 50 per cent, 75 per cent or 100 per cent). Sapien believes a scheme like this could lead to increased application numbers at the priority end. 
  • That the policy be tweaked to allow whole-of-fund level structured derivatives and hedging for VC/PE funds, so investors can benefit from some form of capital protection at the fund-level.
  • That the SIV program is more widely promoted across new emerging high-growth regional economies (such as India, Vietnam, Malaysia and Indonesia).
  • For the Balancing Component to include a new category: government sponsored public-private innovation bonds (including for example digital or renewable energy infrastructure bonds), which can be asset-backed and therefore safer, while also actively and directly creating local jobs in the innovation economy.
  • The establishment of an SIV industry advisory committee to advise the Government on best ways to:
    • Promote and enhance the SIV program over time
    • Prevent or minimise fraud
    • Provide counsel and guidance on how better to regulate the industry and ensuring ongoing adherence to meeting the SIV Policy’s key objectives and Australia’s core national interests.

Editor’s Note: You can now download our app on the Google Play Store or the Apple Store, or write your next best-selling novel with our sister app Toolis, available on the Apple Store and Google Play Store or purchase something from us at, or at
We are happy to note that we are also now on Amazon Australia. Purchase our products as a show of support to us. They are Yaya, Ezzy, Tante June and Xeno backpacks or our beauty products such as LazyBum Skincare Facial Cleanser, LazyBum Skincare Toner and Moisturiser and Blitz Hair Oil Spray.
Also, check out our rate card and media kit here if you would like to advertise with us on this website. Thank you!

Success! You're on the list.

Like What You Read?

Howdy! Thanks for dropping by and reading our stuff. is an independent website that covers all things business and entrepreneurship related. If you like what you read, a little donation from your good self will go a long way in helping us run this site successfully. Thank you!


Leave a Reply