Reading Apps Fail Kids

Sydney, Nov 26: Many children’s reading apps are failing to deliver real educational value, with a new Flinders University study finding that most tools marketed to support early literacy don’t meet evidence-based standards. Led by Dr Lisa Furlong from Flinders’ College of Nursing and Health Sciences, speech pathologists appraised 309 mobile apps claiming to build phonics and phonological awareness skills and recommended just 85 for their potential to support foundational reading development. Almost one in five apps were rated poor quality, despite more than 9,000 such products being available across Apple and Google Play.
“More than 9,000 apps are currently available for children across the Apple and Google Play stores that claim to assist children in developing early reading skills, including phonics,” says Dr Furlong, a practising speech pathologist and researcher, also with the University of Canterbury in New Zealand. “Many apps are aesthetically pleasing and entertaining, but our study showed the majority lack the educational rigour required to teach phonics and phonological awareness effectively.
“In today’s world, with increasing use of mobile devices, parents often turn to mobile apps as a way to support their child’s reading development; we should ensure that what is out there will actually benefit children’s learning.”
The analysis, published in the Early Childhood Education Journal, found no meaningful link between consumer star ratings and expert quality assessments, with popular apps tending to be those with engaging design and smooth functionality rather than strong teaching content. “This research highlights a major gap between consumer perception and educational quality,” says Dr Furlong. “Parents and educators often rely on star ratings and user reviews when selecting mobile apps, but our findings show these metrics are not reliable indicators of educational value.”
Reviewers reported widespread instructional flaws: most apps failed to provide explicit teaching, lacked a structured sequence for letter-sound instruction, did not offer corrective feedback, and in some cases included incorrect modelling, mispronunciations and inappropriate word choices. The researchers are calling for tighter regulation of app store educational claims and a robust certification system to help families and educators identify high-quality tools. “App stores are largely unregulated when it comes to educational claims,” says Dr Furlong. “Clearer labelling and disclosures are essential to ensure that children are engaging with tools that genuinely support their learning.
“Between June 2021 and September 2024, only six new high-quality apps were released that met expert standards. This is a strikingly low number given the volume of apps entering the market. Despite increased advocacy around the science of reading, app developers are not responding with tools that reflect best practice.
“We urgently need more investment in high-quality, evidence-informed educational apps and ongoing collaboration between educators, researchers, and developers to create tools that truly enhance early literacy.”

Top 10 best performing apps (expert-rated):

Hairy Letters

Initial Code

Chimp Fu Syllables

PocketPhonics Stories

PLD 2P Read 1d

Phonological Awareness Lab

Partners in Rhyme for Schools

Phoneme Farm: Kids Reading App

Letter Sounds 2: Digraphs, Trigraphs and Endings

Letter Sounds 1: Phonics Graphemes for Beginners